|
He was highly regarded in the East as a capable administrator of the
Eastern Church in Constantinople.
His death is variously listed as 602, 606 (deadlink www.erols.com site)
or 616.
( is the
modern name for what was referred to as Contantinople in past
times.) He also seems to be at the center of the controversy over
which Bishop is the ultimate authority within the Church - the Bishop of
Rome or the Bishop of Constantinople. Most communications
referencing him regard that matter. There were two Patriarchs of
Constantinople named Cyriac:
Ecumenical Patriarchs of the Great Church of Christ: ... Ciriacus I 217 - 230 alternate Voragine's Ursula legend in the Voragine box below) mentions that (Rome) pope Ciriacus was the nineteenth pope after Peter. Callistus (218~222/3) was the 15th pope after Peter, immediately followed by Urban I (222/3~230), Pontian (230~235), Anterus (235~6) and then Fabian (236~250) - Fabian being the 20th pope (19th after Peter) in our local listing of Emperors, Popes and Persecutions. It further states that this Roman Pope Ciriacus abdicated in favor of Ametus (?Anterus 235~6?) and had his name removed from the catalogue of popes because he went to martyrdom with Ursula and the 11,000 virgins without consulting the other clergy in Rome - removed perhaps by the same DAMNATIO MEMORIAE method used by a couple decades earlier. Given the turmoil during that Period of Military Anarchy (235~283) within Rome and the fact that some of those popes were unknown until their 'tomb inscribed names' were discovered within what came to be called the Crypt of the Popes (within the catacombs of the Callistus cemetery complex), it is possible that there could have been another pope, named Ciriacus/Cyriacus/Kyriakou/Quiriaci/et al, who has disappeared from the official records. (This could even be the former Bishop of Ostia about whom little is known - maybe because of the DAMNATIO MEMORIAE process used on him. ... Cyriacus 596 - 606 (Note that he is not referred to as Cyriacus II - thereby putting into question the legitimacy of the 'supposed' predecessor above.) [ See Kyriakus, below. ] . . . Cyriacus 595-606 is reflected at that blogspot site, along with a listing of all the Patriarchs of Constantinople 315-1462 Oct 27 - The True Vineyard 27 Sunday 7th OF LUKE; Nestor Gt. M; Cyriacus of Constantinople is one feast day found referencing him or ??? Except for the indication that some of the stories have him in Rome (hundreds of years apart), he could be the Pope to whom reference is made when relating the legend of St. Ursula and the 11,000 virgins. Some links to those references:
The story of Ursula, all in Latin still untranslated by this webmaster, with numerous references to Ciriaci, Ciriaco, Ciriacus and Cyriacus as papa, papam and pape is contained online in the year 1516 published version of John of Tynemouth's early 14th century work: He is also the Bishop to whom or about whom the following Epistles from St. Gregory (The Great - Pope 590-604) were written (note that another page at this web site has other Epistles from St. Gregory written to or about the contemporaneous Abbot Cyriacus):
Pope Boniface III gets the Emperor Phocas to decree that '... "the See of Blessed Peter the Apostle should be the head of all the Churches" and that the title of "Universal Bishop" should be reserved exclusively for the bishop of Rome. ...' This, of course, establishes the Papacy in Rome rather than Constantinople - so far as the Roman Empire is concerned. Boniface was buried in St. Peter's, November 12, the same year in which he was consecrated. His communications regarding Cyriacus imply that Cyriacus must not have died in 602 or 606! That doesn't sit well with the eastern Church as can be seen in
Book IV
Chapter 7 (500k file!)
. . . the Church, and entire prerogative of my brethren. If your
holiness calls me universal Pope, it denies itself to be this whole which
it acknowledges me to be."
"At length Phocas, who had slain Maurice, and usurped his place, (more friendly to the Romans, for what reason I know not, or rather because he had been crowned king there without opposition,) conceded to Boniface III what Gregory by no means demanded, viz., that Rome should be the head of all the churches. In this way the controversy was ended. . . ." (An alternative site has the same document.) "Another emperor who becomes a case in point was Phocas, who, in the seventh century, became displeased with Cyriacus, bishop of Constantinople, divested him of his title as the universal head of the Church, and conferred this title upon Boniface III, the Roman pontiff who accepted it. By what authority we ask? Again it was political. The record does not show whether the Emperor Phocas was even a member of the Christian Church." (alternative site) THE LIFE OF ST. THEODORE OF SYKEON 79
And the most blessed Patriarch Kyriakus wrote to the metropolitan to grant Theodore's request-for the Emperor had ordered him to do this-and at the same time to bestow upon him the bishop's 'Omophorion' [A wide band of embroidered stuff, corresponding to the Western pallium] so that he would retain his rank, because he was a holy man and it was through no fault of his that he was resigning his bishopric. On receiving ... 82
93
128
The dates of the Patriarchs of Constantinople at this time are:
|
guestbook Home (Secular & Christian)
Website link/location/URL: http://www.Cyriac-FHP.com/ccx.htm