State Representative Barbara Notestein, et al
Wisconsin Assembly
State Capitol Office 126-W
Madison, WI 53702
Re: Parental Choice, AB-601; some ideas and suggestions relevant
thereto and request for immediate, positive action thereon
Dear Barbara:
This letter presents some ideas and observations intended to convince
you, and the other CC: addresses not already so inclined, that we are in
a crisis situation requiring immediate passage of the Parental Choice
Bill, AB-6O1, sponsored by Polly Williams and numerous others. My
presentation attempts to relate events unfolding in Eastern Europe as
they relate to the need for us to prevent similar types of actions from
occurring within some of our own institutions having almost identical
structures, orientations and constituencies. My interpretation of
those events, which represent the terminal failure of the most
significant socio-political experiment in human history, are:
BUREAUCRACY: Significant of most large organizations are the innumerable rules and procedures required to govern the actions of their enormous constituencies. While these rules ensure continuity and stability, their applicability in the face of a constantly changing world becomes geometrically more difficult the greater the number of people required to reach a consensus regarding their revision.
In addition, as evidenced in Eastern Europe, when there are no
alternative organizations constantly experimenting, adapting and showing
the way toward more effective action, the bureaucracy lacks role models
which would precipitate change in an orderly, consistent fashion.
(The fact that East European decision makers controlled, thereby
guaranteeing their own perquisites predisposed their natural, human
aversion to change. Had more risk been involved, they would more
likely have 'managed' to adapt their organizations to an ever changing
reality while maintaining their relative, desirable stability. As
it is, they're left no choice but to start over from scratch. Many
of our own larger public and private organizations face this same
reality.)
CHOICES: Allowing people no alternatives
guarantees that problems will eventually grow beyond control.
That's simply because policies follow the path of least resistance -
usually meaning no significant change. They become more
dysfunctional as the rest of the environment evolves toward a differing
reality. Allowing freedom of choice ensures that producers of
products or services, as opposed to consumers, will suffer the
consequences of failure to adapt, thereby encouraging adaptation rather
than stagnation.
FREEDOM: The multiplicity of alternatives is what
drives our free enterprise system. The ease with which alternative
suppliers of services or products can enter the marketplace to satisfy
continually changing consumer preferences ensures progress, rather than
stagnation in a changing environment.
PEOPLE POWER: People will constrain their own
power only so long as they perceive themselves to be confronted by
overwhelming force. Outrageous conditions foisted upon people by
misguided leaders may increase their motivation to the point where they
feel they are more powerful than ANY opposing force. (While the
former, thanks to the removed threat of intervention by Russian troops,
is now being evidenced in Eastern Europe, the latter has mostly been
evidenced in the French, American, numerous Chinese and other
revolutions.)
PROFIT MOTIVE: Contrary to what many people think,
most small business owners value independence over vast wealth. It's
the need to increase revenues to match ever rising costs that really
motivates us to make profits. And, unlike the socialism now failing
miserably in Eastern Europe, so long as neither profits nor costs are
completely subsidized, suppliers of goods and services will have to
continually come up with new ways to adapt in order to stay in business.
PROBLEM SOLVING: The combination of CHOICES, FREEDOM and PROFIT MOTIVE ensures that problem solvers will develop faster than problems, thereby creating a self-regulating, homeostatic free enterprise system obviating the necessity for PEOPLE POWER. It seems logical and desirable to include as many of these factors as we can in our unavoidably NECESSARY BUREAUCRACIES, so that they too can help ration, rather than monopolize resources in a constantly changing environment.
We in Wisconsin have the opportunity to do just that with the Parental
Choice Bill. We can make it a role model showing others how to
encourage bureaucratic adaptation by incorporating into our laws, rather
than disregarding, the competitive, open market, self-regulating aspects
of free enterprise capitalism. While we don't want to throw open
the entire educational system to free market competition, we can
encourage alternatives which increase parental choice, the exercise of
which then also gives us feedback regarding the progress of adaptation
within our school systems. The following point out the significant,
immediate advantages of creating educational alternatives and choices
where none now REALLY exist:
EFFICIENCY: Smaller educational alternatives
unencumbered by size, organizational culture and time-honored procedures
would be excellent 'public fishbowls' in which to test and/or refine new
techniques tackling our most intractable ongoing problems. Also
rewarding some teachers, administrators and other school system personnel
sabbatical years, without suffering loss of pay or other time based
emoluments, in these ENTIRELY INDEPENDENT alternative schools would be a
good way to recharge their mental and motivational batteries. It goes
without saying that neither existing management nor unions should have any
authority over these alternative schools or their 'independence' will become
meaningless and worthless.
IMMEDIATELY ENHANCED PARENTAL & COMMUNITY SKILLS: Requiring participating parents to 'buy into' these alternatives with volunteer time equivalent to the voucher subsidy obtained would lower their operating costs, enhance parental skills and improve role modeling opportunities within neighborhoods. The dysfunctional children with whom I've become acquainted over the past couple years mostly need the one on one attention normally provided by a parent. That gets them to the point of BECOMING EDUCABLE by more competent professionals.
We are wasting our precious resources requiring educators to do the jobs of parents. On the other hand, we are also evidencing our naivete expecting parents whose children are most in need of educational alternatives to express parental responsibilities about which they either:
It's time for all us adults to come together to take action which will benefit 'our' children and 'our' collective futures. Let's set aside managerial, union, social, political and other alienating differences and solve this immediate problem before we become buried, like Eastern Europe in our own misdirection.
Respectfully and Happy Holidays to all,
Ruben J. Ciriacks, MBA, fellow concerned citizen, born again Milwaukean, community volunteer and June 1960 Washington High School dropout. (I've been where many of today's children are!)
ENCL: BLACK and HIGHKIDS idea paper
CC: WI State Representatives Marcia Coggs, Tom Loftus, Gwen Moore and Polly Williams
WI State Senators Tom Barrett, Brian Burke and Gary George
Governor Tommy Thompson
MPS Superintendent Robert Peterkin
Mayor John Norquist
Senator Herb Kohl and Congressman Jim Moody
(By copy of this letter to you, I'm asking this rhetorical question:
Surely, when the federal government can find money to fund stealth bombers, the intended use of which is to precipitate the eventual destruction of all life on earth, and can support career academies able to generate dropouts faster than their signatures can dry on the 'federally guaranteed' tuition loan forms, it can also find ways to help some little children crying desperately for help from a world over which they have no control and into which they did not ask to be brought!?)
DD: 12/30/89 LETTERS ab601/mps FO=P 10:07:15
Website link/location/URL: http://Ruben.Ciriacks.com/89d20cho.htm